How we use artificial intelligence
This university uses artificial intelligence for teaching, and anyone who teaches with a tool is responsible for it. Here we explain what it does, what it never does, and whom you can contact to file a complaint.
What we use it for
- Write the draft of the lessons, which a professor will then approve.
- Correct your exercises and provide you with feedback.
- Propose a learning path for you based on what you are looking for.
- Supporting you: the lesson assistant, the Disputatio Master, and the Final Degree Project tutor.
- Translate the content and read it aloud.
What AI never decides
- No grade that counts is assigned by AI: its correction is formative and does not affect your degree.
- No degree is issued alone: a coordinator approves it and an administrator issues it.
- No content reaches you without a professor having approved it.
- No learning path leaves out this university’s common core curriculum.
What we do not do, and why
We do not analyze your emotions or mood. It is prohibited in education under European AI regulations, and we are glad that it is: affectively profiling an adult learner in order to act on them without their knowledge is to treat them as an object.
We do care if no one is left behind, and we address it in another way: if you have not logged in for a long time, we notify someone so they can check in on you.
We also do not use your assignments or conversations to train models, nor do we profile you for commercial purposes.
Your information
Your conversations with the assistants are deleted after 36 months. The corrections and content are retained because they constitute the record that makes it possible to verify what you studied if it ever needs to be certified.
If something seems wrong to you
You may appeal a correction that you consider unfair or content that you believe is erroneous, and a person will respond to you within 10 business days.
Enter the campus to submit an appeal, or write to admisiones@iacampus.es.
This university follows the Magisterium of the Church on artificial intelligence, and in particular the encyclical letter Magnifica Humanitas (Magnificent Humanity) of Pope Leo XIV (2026), on safeguarding the human person in the age of artificial intelligence.
The essential point that follows from this policy is that artificial intelligence is not morally neutral, and that the machine does not live what it imitates—it does not love, suffer, or possess a moral conscience. Therefore, no AI here makes any decision on its own that truly matters.
Before putting this into operation, an impact assessment on fundamental rights was carried out, which is what Article 27 of the European Artificial Intelligence Regulation requires of those who use high-risk systems in education. It is approved, reviewed annually, and is available to the competent authority upon request. It is an internal working document: it acknowledges what is not yet resolved, and that is why it is useful.
We also follow the six principles of the Rome Call for AI Ethics—transparency, inclusion, responsibility, impartiality, reliability, and safety and privacy—as well as European regulations on artificial intelligence and data protection. Read the entire document.